Snort mailing list archives
Re: high packet loss - low throughput
From: waldo kitty <wkitty42 () windstream net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 23:17:36 -0400
On 7/19/2013 15:51, Michal Purzynski wrote:
64 bit of course. It's Ubuntu 12.04.2, everything updated, etc.
and i can't help it but this has been nipping at me ever since i read it the
first time...
1. why "of course"??
2. i would try the 32bit load and see what happens there... 64bit stuff takes at
least twice the space and may be half as fast depending on factors...
[anecdote: we have seen that 64bit doesn't offer an advantages in our
environments... at best there's twice as much resources needed for roughtly the
same load and half the speed as well... we've just not been able to truly
justify the 64bit builds of the firewall we work with but for some reason
everyone thinks that 64bit is better than the tried, tested and true 32bit stuff...]
with that stated, i would seriously consider testing the 32bit load of SO and
ensure that it is at least using the PAE kernel so that all that memory is
recognized and used...
what can it hurt, really? ;)
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
Please keep mailing list traffic on the list unless
private contact is specifically requested and granted.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users
Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput, (continued)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput waldo kitty (Jul 17)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Michal Purzynski (Jul 17)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput waldo kitty (Jul 17)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Michal Purzynski (Jul 18)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Michal Purzynski (Jul 19)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput waldo kitty (Jul 19)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Michal Purzynski (Jul 19)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput waldo kitty (Jul 19)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput rmkml (Jul 19)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput waldo kitty (Jul 19)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Michal Purzynski (Jul 17)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput waldo kitty (Jul 19)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Michal Purzynski (Jul 20)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Joel Esler (Jul 20)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Michal Purzynski (Jul 21)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Joel Esler (Jul 21)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Michal Purzynski (Jul 21)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput beenph (Jul 21)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Joel Esler (Jul 21)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Michal Purzynski (Jul 21)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Michal Purzynski (Jul 22)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput Livio Ricciulli (Jul 22)
- Re: high packet loss - low throughput waldo kitty (Jul 17)
