Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: stealth executables
From: asoto () INAME COM (Adolfo Soto)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 18:44:43 +0200
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Brad Griffin wrote:
Hi all. I was reading a mainstream newsletter a couple of days ago which had the following article. Forgive me if it is common knowledge (it was a new one for me).
I guess this is quite the same that the bug reported at: http://www.kriptopolis.com/boletin/0138.txt Spanish only sorry. This bug (reported to MS before September) allows to hide an executable in a new extension type. So don't double-click anything just because it ends in "thx" i.ex. :-)
The Danger Of Stealth Executables "SHS" and other little-known or seemingly-benign file types (often completely ignored by antivirus apps) can disguise malicious executables and macro viruses! A reader from Canada, recently had an eye- opening experience that's instructive to us all:
[...snip..] -- Adolfo Soto -Subscriber of The Boulder Pledge - PGP mail welcome. Fingerprint: BD 12 A9 E2 0D 63 23 6F 88 D9 3E 32 20 F1 57 84
Current thread:
- Re: FreeBSD listen(), (continued)
- Re: FreeBSD listen() 3APA3A (Oct 29)
- Re: FreeBSD listen() David Schwartz (Oct 30)
- Re: FreeBSD listen() 3APA3A (Oct 31)
- Re: FreeBSD listen() Sebastian (Oct 28)
- Re: FreeBSD listen() 3APA3A (Oct 29)
- Re: FreeBSD listen() Warren Young (Oct 28)
- Re: ICQ 2000 Bernie Cosell (Oct 27)
- Re: ICQ 2000 Ripple (Oct 26)
- Re: ICQ 2000 Sean Burford (Oct 26)
- stealth executables Brad Griffin (Oct 26)
- Re: stealth executables Adolfo Soto (Sep 30)
- [Fwd: ICQ 2000] Blue Boar (Oct 26)
- Re: [Fwd: ICQ 2000] Brad Griffin (Oct 27)
- Re: ICQ 2000 Blue Boar (Oct 30)
- Re: forged packets? Ron DuFresne (Oct 26)
