Wireshark mailing list archives
Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]?
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 03:02:19 +0200
There's nothing new to the packet_list code in there any more ;-)
Ciao
Jörg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]? Joerg Mayer (Sep 03)
- Re: Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]? Guy Harris (Sep 03)
- Re: Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]? Joerg Mayer (Sep 03)
- Re: Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]? Guy Harris (Sep 03)
