Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]?
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 04:39:58 +0200
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 06:11:54PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
Yes. The routines should probably be renamed as well.
Done both (r44764 and r44765).
Ciao
Jörg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]? Joerg Mayer (Sep 03)
- Re: Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]? Guy Harris (Sep 03)
- Re: Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]? Joerg Mayer (Sep 03)
- Re: Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]? Guy Harris (Sep 03)
