Intrusion Detection Systems mailing list archives
Re: RE: mouse trap + fight back!
From: JohnNicholson () aol com (JohnNicholson () aol com)
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 16:21:35 EDT
Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au In a message dated 5/17/2000 3:59:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, grwilliamson () Home com writes:
The legalities still play an important though, is it entrapment or did we put out a welcome message to greet the intruder.
We debated the "honeypot = entrapment" issue a while back. I'd suggest you go to the archives and do a search on honeypot. The short answer is that a honeypot is not entrapment, particularly not under US law. When someone breaks into your network, regardless of whether they break into a honeypot or your most sensitive files, they are still an unauthorized user. For a further discussion of whether an unauthorized user of a system has committed a crime, see the article I wrote on the subject in the February 2000 issue of USENIX; login: John
Current thread:
- Re: mouse trap + fight back! JohnNicholson () aol com (May 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: mouse trap + fight back! Meritt, Jim (May 17)
- Re: mouse trap + fight back! bacano (May 18)
- Re: RE: mouse trap + fight back! JohnNicholson () aol com (May 17)