nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:40:44 -1000
FWIW, my current IPv6 assignment is PI to a degree (where P == my first hop IPv4 provider), I can change this "first hop IPv4" provider to any other provider within my country and still retain my IPv6 assignment.
it sounds as if you have the mythical separation of locator and identifier :-)/2. the problem is that there is likely to be a shortage of those locators. one problem with 6to4 is that having all traffic go through gateways will not scale well. to support v6-only folk, either the number of 6to4 gateways will need to approach the number of dfz routers, the dfz routers will run 6to4, or some combination thereof. randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Oct 15)
- shim6 ... easy? bmanning (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Kevin Loch (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Gregory Edigarov (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Alexei Roudnev (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 news Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 24)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 24)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
