nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Paul Jakma <paul () clubi ie>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:53:07 +0100 (IST)
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
it sounds as if you have the mythical separation of locator and identifier :-)/2. the problem is that there is likely to be a shortage of those locators.
Yes ;^)Note that it's not 6to4, it's a proper 2001:: /48 delegation via the SIXXS tunnel-broker, which is mine to use long as ISPs here do not deploy IPv6 ;).
one problem with 6to4 is that having all traffic go through gateways will not scale well. to support v6-only folk, either the number of 6to4 gateways will need to approach the number of dfz routers, the dfz routers will run 6to4, or some combination thereof.
ACK.
And 6to4 obviously won't fly for long after the 4 tank runs dry.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul () clubi ie paul () jakma org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
In Hollywood, if you don't have happiness, you send out for it.
-- Rex Reed
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Oct 15)
- shim6 ... easy? bmanning (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Kevin Loch (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Gregory Edigarov (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Alexei Roudnev (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 news Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 24)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 24)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
