nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Kevin Loch <kloch () hotnic net>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:25:40 -0400
Paul Jakma wrote:
And 6to4 obviously won't fly for long after the 4 tank runs dry.
Hopefully it won't need to at that point as it is only intended as a transitional step. I like the simplicity of 6to4 and the way it preserves end-to-end addresses. If only there was a way to adapt it's stateless automatic tunneling to solve the IPv6 multihoming/PI problem. I took a quick hack at it and the result is interesting though far from perfect: http://kl.net/ipv6/pi-in-6.txt - Kevin
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Oct 15)
- shim6 ... easy? bmanning (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Kevin Loch (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Gregory Edigarov (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Alexei Roudnev (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 news Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 24)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 24)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
