nanog mailing list archives
Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit?
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:11:51 +0100
* mark@tinka.africa (Mark Tinka) [Sat 16 Nov 2024, 02:53 CET]:
The original intention for route servers is to simplify turn-up for the majority of networks, most of whom will be eyeball-focused. They did offer cloud & content folk utility as they quickly ramped up their CDN deployments globally over the past decade-and-a-bit.
One of the original intentions was that. The other, major, driver was control plane scalability. For a while IXPs grew way too large in regard to the number of available peers for certain routing engines from certain vendors to keep up in case there ever was a switch outage. A router server could radically decrease the number of EBGP peers and thus overhead.
-- Niels.
Current thread:
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit?, (continued)
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Mark Tinka (Nov 07)
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Tom Beecher (Nov 07)
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Mike Tindor (Nov 07)
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Mike Tindor (Nov 07)
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Peter Potvin via NANOG (Nov 07)
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Mike Tindor (Nov 07)
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Mike Tindor (Nov 07)
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Mark Tinka (Nov 08)
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Nick Hilliard (Nov 08)
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Mark Tinka (Nov 15)
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Niels Bakker (Nov 16)
- RE: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Kevin McCormick (Nov 27)
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Mike Hammett (Nov 17)
- Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit? Zach Underwood (Nov 17)
