nanog mailing list archives

Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024


From: Noah <noah () neo co tz>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:09:23 +0300

On Mon, 18 Nov 2024, 22:33 heasley, <heas () shrubbery net> wrote:

Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 12:48:04PM -0800, William Herrin:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 12:39 PM Noah <noah () neo co tz> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024, 22:06 David Conrad via NANOG, <nanog () nanog org>
wrote:
2. I'm not convinced that the service regions should be limited by
the ICP to non-overlapping geographic territories.

While geographic monopolies may have made sense in the past, it is
unclear to me how/why they make sense today (unless the point is to
create/perpetuate a cartel).

I am curious as to what you mean by create/perpetuate a cartel?

A group of geographical monopolies who between them have total control
over what the essential service costs and whether anybody else can
perform it. It might as well be the definition of a cartel.

And, to the extent that the service provider must excel.

Competition is healthy for all enterprise.


The registries are more than just an enterprise boss.

Noah



Current thread: