nanog mailing list archives

Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days?


From: Andrew Latham via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 14:14:29 -0700

Mike

Yes and Yes. I have some seriously old stuff and often corporate standards
move forward faster that vendor updates.

HTTPS - lack of updated CA data can cause issue when the user can not
update the data.
SSH - Some offers of legacy ciphers/algorithms can be flagged by
security sweeps.

I am sure I could go down a rabbit hole. There are devices that work
but get flagged for
how they work within tight controls.

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 2:05 PM Michael Thomas via NANOG
<nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:


On 12/18/25 7:24 AM, Andrew Latham via NANOG wrote:
Matt

Some open software would really keep a lot of this stuff out of the
trash. I have Cyclades and Lantronix stuff on a shelf that works. I
got tired of maintaining a box-in-the-middle to deal with ssh ciphers.

Have cipher suites really changed that much in the last 20 years or so?
After the sha1 kerfuffle and needing to up RSA key sizes, has there been
much change?

Or are you talking about some seriously old kit that predates that?

Mike, out of the loop



On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 7:43 AM Matt Brennan <brennanma () gmail com> wrote:
Up until recently I was using the Raritan Dominion SX II models. Dual PSU, dual NIC, and configurations ranging 
from 4 to 48 ports.  However, Raritan has just discontinued that as of June. It is unclear how long they will 
continue to provide security patches.

They are recommending customers switch to the ZPE Systems Nodegrid Serial Consoles. It looks to be much the same, 
but I haven't had a chance to test one yet. The only difference I've noticed is the ZPE device seems to have an 
embedded 5G cellular module.


On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 at 09:34, Andrew Latham via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
Dan

I have stacks and stacks of serial console servers. Today I mostly use
an https://www.coolgear.com/product/32-port-rs-232-usb-to-serial-adapter
with some pictures of the guts at
https://lathama.net/Tech/Hardware/USB-32COM-RM if interested. It is my
solution to a quick build of an https://freetserv.github.io/

(I have seen some things)

On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 5:51 PM Dan Mahoney via NANOG
<nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
Hey there folks.

Dayjob has historically used USB TTY pods attached to real BSD machines to talk to our cisco consoles, with the 
amazing benefit that with a program like Vixie's rtty (or conserver) you can also capture the output of those 
consoles in real-time, and perhaps use that data to identify a connected device.

As a bonus, because the rackmount devices have real DE-9's on them, it means they work with any kind of cable 
you get (not just your standard rj45 cisco rollover like you might get with a Cyclades thing -- and you don't 
have to come up with the weird-ass mappings for rj45-serial like you might need like our ME4012 NAS (the serial 
cable is a stereo plug), our smart power strips (it's either a stereo plug, or an rj12), or something like an 
older brocade switch (it's a DE9, but it's friggin ODD, and I think it may also be the wrong gender).

It also means, since you're running a real OS, you have patches as long as the OS is supported (so you're not 
stuck with "gee it only speaks rsa1024"), versus some EOL appliance.  But it's also 2u, and since we're recently 
buying a lot of Dell hardware, that's Super Overkill for a dell, so I'm evaluating maybe just going "Appliance".

If we stick with an existing unix box for this, I'd want something with proper IPMI/OOB (so Rpi is out) but 
maybe the dumbest, shallowest-depth atom64 supermicro you can find, in the event you need to do a reinstall or 
catch a hung system.

Are there things that other folks are using that are "easy" to work with that you've found to have Long firmware 
lives, decent warranties and low hassle?  Does anything these days actually have DE9s on it?

-Dan

(You may have also seen my note earlier about the Cisco ASR920, which has RS232 pins in a USB-A header.  No, not 
via a PL2032 chip inside the host that provides a virtual serial...direct txd/rxd/gnd/cts etc, on the USB pins.  
I've seen things you people would't believe)
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/5VV3B6CVSW3KVIFFU4GOF5V5FAI625IG/


--
- Andrew "lathama" Latham -
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/CPBVORP6B7P5ZJ6CN4TX4YZNFYWZMGSC/


_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/Z4SBTD3J6VR24NDBUYWPIIGFQSTDZGWW/



-- 
- Andrew "lathama" Latham -
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/DJ3XMKQMR4KIGYDFWNDYDQTP7I7CAFN6/

Current thread: