nanog mailing list archives
Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days?
From: Brandon Martin via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 16:12:42 -0500
On 12/19/25 12:54, Chris Adams via NANOG wrote:
Cisco 2500 series used a 68EC030, which is a dumbed-down 68030 with no MMU. The Linux m68k project always required an MMU, so it would not run on that CPU.
FWIW, MMU-less Linux is a thing and is no longer a separate fork. It's supported by the mainline kernel sources. Just turn off CONFIG_MMU. M68k should be supported for this purpose along with most other popular architectures were MMUs are not an inherent part of the CPU architecture including ARM and PPC.
You also still need enough RAM. The bare minimum is 4MB, and 8MB is far more realistic, and that's just for the kernel itself.
The result, though, is a system with some serious limitations which was also true of the old uClinux fork. In particular, there's no way to run most standard ELF executables. You either need to use uclinux FLAT ABI images (which does not support dynamic linking at all) or the much newer (and with tenable toolchain support) FDPIC ELF ABI.
Either ABI imposes limitations on what userspace can do. For example, fork(2) doesn't work, though vfork does. OpenSSH doesn't even compile against the relevant headers IIRC, but dropbear does though I had trouble getting it to work at last attempt.
Support for various other features often considered sundry to Linux varies, too. For example, on ARMv7-M, causing a segmentation fault from userspace will crash the entire system with rather terse kernel panic instead of terminating the offending process. This is not a technical limitation but rather a lacking implementation. Debuggers also don't work properly and instead lock the system up (ditto regarding it not being a technical limitation AFAIK).
I'm not sure that really solves the desire to meaningfully run Linux of this platform for the purpose intended.
-- Brandon Martin _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/OIWTGINAXFVDSQ2WARMMGXVCPXYASJUC/
Current thread:
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days?, (continued)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Andrew Latham via NANOG (Dec 18)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Matt Brennan via NANOG (Dec 18)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Andrew Latham via NANOG (Dec 18)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Michael Thomas via NANOG (Dec 18)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Andrew Latham via NANOG (Dec 18)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Mike Simpson via NANOG (Dec 18)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Trey Scarborough via NANOG (Dec 19)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Chris Adams via NANOG (Dec 19)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Shawn L via NANOG (Dec 19)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Andrew Latham via NANOG (Dec 19)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Brandon Martin via NANOG (Dec 21)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Ryan Hamel via NANOG (Dec 21)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Brandon Martin via NANOG (Dec 22)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Ray Soucy via NANOG (Dec 22)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Tom Beecher via NANOG (Dec 22)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Matt Brennan via NANOG (Dec 18)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Andrew Latham via NANOG (Dec 18)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 22)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Andrew Latham via NANOG (Dec 18)
- Re: What are folks using for serial consoles these days? Brandon Martin via NANOG (Dec 22)
