nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective)
From: Andrew via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 22:18:37 +0000
My experience on my own home network is that ~80% of wan traffic is v6-native, ~19% is using dns64/nat64, and ~1% is ipv4-native. This is for 5 people in the US. The 1% includes all of the (internet-bound) traffic from all devices that don’t support v6 at all, and all traffic from sockets which don’t respect dns64. I’m not using ipv6-only/mostly, just enabling dns64 in parallel with dual stack. So much of the traffic goes to streaming services. So very much traffic. Andrew _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/DLUQBSGSMJQXZYBGCGVIJ4BDY54SVIDW/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective), (continued)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Lucien Hoydic via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Mike Crute via NANOG (Jun 21)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Mark Tinka via NANOG (Jun 21)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Tom Mitchell via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Forrest Christian (List Account) via NANOG (Jun 20)
