nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective)
From: Tom Mitchell via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 07:03:32 -0700
"Why bother adding the cost of supporting a dual-stack network when there is precisely zero cost for me to stick with IPv4? " What is the incremental cost? - Tom _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/IMGEEKHISXNI47PYUQLZJQKRSOJC2DX7/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective), (continued)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Crist Clark via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re[2]: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Adam Fathauer via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: Re[2]: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Forrest Christian (List Account) via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) jordi.palet--- via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Lucien Hoydic via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Mike Crute via NANOG (Jun 21)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Mark Tinka via NANOG (Jun 21)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Tom Mitchell via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Forrest Christian (List Account) via NANOG (Jun 20)