nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective)
From: Mark Tinka via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 12:15:32 +0200
On 6/20/25 15:58, Saku Ytti via NANOG wrote:
I switched my home internet couple weeks ago to ipv6less, because it was 5eur MRC cheaper. I don’t think customers care about ipv6 at all.
Customers never did care. Mark. _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/4QB5OQQXE37ET4FXGRNDEGQJYSYVNKSE/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective), (continued)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) nanog--- via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Crist Clark via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re[2]: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Adam Fathauer via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: Re[2]: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Forrest Christian (List Account) via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) jordi.palet--- via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Lucien Hoydic via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Mike Crute via NANOG (Jun 21)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Mark Tinka via NANOG (Jun 21)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Tom Mitchell via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv6 native percentage (end user perspective) Forrest Christian (List Account) via NANOG (Jun 20)