nanog mailing list archives

Re: is it just me or...


From: John Levine via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: 24 May 2025 17:34:02 -0400

It appears that Bryan Fields via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> said:
On 5/23/25 16:56, Michael Thomas via NANOG wrote:
Not DKIM, DMARC to be more precise. I'm certain that close all of the
domains people are sending from if they have a DMARC record, it's p=none
which shouldn't trigger the 822.From rewrite, but that's what seems to
be happening.

lists.nanog.org is configured to rewrite the from regardless of DMARC setting.

Yup.  Not a great choice.

Even if you have p=none, it still shows as a broken signature on the email and 
will be rejected by google/MS/etc.  They are large enough to violate the 
standards and we all have to submit, unless you pay for delivery to their 
customers.

Sorry, but this is nonsense.  Please, sir, step away from the kool-aid.  They
aren't perfect but that kind of conspiracy theory helps nobody.

I run mailing lists that have lots of subscribers at large providers,
They only rewrite sender addresses when DMARC policies require it, and
they get mail delivered just fine.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/NNIMEXU3KESP3JALLDHA5IT2JDNDT7J3/


Current thread: