Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales)

[Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

I am not checking my emails until Nov 14th, 2025. Thanks, Samaneh

On Nov 6, 2025, at 3:51 PM, Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:

On 06.11.2025 12:11 Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard () huawei com>
wrote:

Tell any financial department that 2% does not matter
and see the reaction.

Please tell that the various companies that route IPv6 traffic. All the
ISP that don't have enough IPv4 want to have more traffic via IPv6 to
save resources in their NAT gateways.

This year was a talk at the RIPE conference about that topic.
TLDR: IPv6 is cheaper in such situations.

The larger header size is simply irrelevant.

--
kind regards
Marco

Send spam to abfall1762427476 () stinkedores dorfdsl de
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/DOLKO2JWXDIASP7PPCJNPT37ZO654CDX/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/6RG5Q6QNWU5IKLKM3GDH3YU4SGVX4GX7/