nanog mailing list archives
Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales)
From: Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 12:06:25 +0000
I am not checking my emails until Nov 14th, 2025. Thanks, Samaneh On Nov 8, 2025, at 7:55 AM, Gary Sparkes via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: Or, in some cases, to comply with the federal mandate, just slap cloudflare/LB service of choice/etc in front of whatever on the outside and call it a day..... I remember a CEO in 2016 stating in an interview that IPv6 was a priority for them - and it was. All external services hosted for gov customers are IPv6 accessible. Internal IPv6 years later for them? Hah. Nope. -----Original Message----- From: Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> Sent: Saturday, November 8, 2025 1:49 AM To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org> Cc: Marco Moock <mm () dorfdsl de> Subject: Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) On 07.11.2025 06:32 Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard () huawei com> wrote: 3. My message was not that "IPv4 is enough". The shortage of IPv4 addresses is real. My message was that IPv6 design is so bad (on the subnet level) that businesses would stay on IPv4. Businesses stay on that because they don't want change. This applies to operating system versions and protocols. Remember when most businesses transferred HTTP traffic without TLS? It was Google that made that mandatory, so they implemented it. Same applies for SPF and DKIM. It existed more than 10 years and when Google and other big player made it mandatory, the businesses hurried up and implemented it. If Google ever decides to make IPv6 a criteria for page rank, businesses will implement that very fast. -- kind regards Marco Send spam to abfall1762493530 () stinkedores dorfdsl de _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/BG3VLZAXAUGMZHN4KMANFLZVY3MIJE5K/__;!!PtGJab4!7vGMOYN8bNLNw8G6Jzlkh1w_9hXTzd99yJ-SDqiq8O8qWrVDhG3CZBHx9qodIjgLMFThyhP3qnpMTMd3AFBdqwtQjik$ [lists[.]nanog[.]org] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/JH3JOBCSECUA7DQDSKGKUGQGMDPJVC3E/
Current thread:
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales), (continued)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 06)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Saku Ytti via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 07)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Nov 07)
- Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- RE: my finance department cares deeply about 2% nanog--- via NANOG (Nov 06)
- RE: my finance department cares deeply about 2% nanog--- via NANOG (Nov 06)
- RE: [External Sender] RE: my finance department cares deeply about 2% Matt Rienzo via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: [External Sender] RE: my finance department cares deeply about 2% Matthew Petach via NANOG (Nov 07)
- RE: [External Sender] RE: my finance department cares deeply about 2% Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Nov 07)
- Re: [External Sender] RE: my finance department cares deeply about 2% Javier J via NANOG (Nov 07)
