nanog mailing list archives
RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales)
From: Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 12:11:16 +0000
Tell any financial department that 2% does not matter and see the reaction. Ed/ -----Original Message----- From: Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2025 14:53 To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org> Cc: Marco Moock <mm () dorfdsl de> Subject: Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) On 06.11.2025 07:12 Vasilenko Eduard wrote:
The issue that 128bits (64+64) are wasted in every packet. Formally, for "privacy". Content providers are lathing from such form or privacy. But it is 2% of the internet capacity.
No one cares nowadays. The amount of other crap traffic (scrapers, AI, spam, DDoS attacks) is a real problem, the additional bits in the header aren't. The time of slow dialup connections where every bit matters, is over. _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/GQ5AQ75WAWRXFYS54QLFQAUMDGCM4QV4/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/3WJNGJSN3R252QI7CWBDOTAL37LNQFIH/
Current thread:
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales), (continued)
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) tim--- via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 06)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Saku Ytti via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 07)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Nov 07)
- Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
