Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales)

[Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

Am 05.11.2025 um 13:03:46 Uhr schrieb Vasilenko Eduard:

> > Are you aware that EUI64 is only one way to generate the addresses
> > and that the 64 bits can be randomly filled or be static?  
> Do you mean that random garbage (for privacy) did return 2% resources
> to the Internet? These 16 bytes (8 for source and 8 for destination)
> are still used not for IP addressing. Does it matter for what it is
> used, if it is not IP addressing? IPv6 is 64+bit architecture (a few
> bits are used inside subnet)

I do not understand what you are talking about.
For IPv6, the subnets that are connected to links should always be /64.
Various ways exist to fill the other 64 bit.

> > If you want NAT really hard, you can use it with IPv6 too. fd00::/8
> > exist.  
> Then it is better to use NTP. But IETF makes everything possible to
> block it too. Anyway, if NAT (in any form) is blocked then there is
> no practical solution for ISP redundancy:

There is and I pointed that out. The NAT "redundancy" "solutions" do
not offer redundancy. They are a cripple solution.


-- 
Gruß
Marco

Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1762344226muell () cartoonies org

Attachment: _bin
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/7EPNFMPM7BUKH3YI2MYUAUV5YYQAAVEA/