nanog mailing list archives
RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales)
From: Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 07:12:03 +0000
The issue that 128bits (64+64) are wasted in every packet. Formally, for "privacy". Content providers are lathing from such form or privacy. But it is 2% of the internet capacity. Eduard -----Original Message----- From: Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2025 10:07 To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org> Cc: Marco Moock <mm () dorfdsl de> Subject: Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) On 06.11.2025 06:27 Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard () huawei com> wrote:
I do not understand what you are talking about.IPv6 is mostly using SLAAC. SLAAC is 64 bit addressing architecture. (by the way, 64 bit is enough for addressing of everything) Even if somebody use DHCP, he typically makes subnet "SLAAC compatible", it means: use 64 bits for addressing.
Where is the issue there? Unless the A-bit is set for the prefix in the RA, no machine will do autoconfiguration using SLAAC. -- kind regards Marco Send spam to abfall1762406841 () stinkedores dorfdsl de _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/R7NGCCEZQCTUDHI4G6M66VEWGNB26RKY/
Current thread:
- Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales), (continued)
- Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Javier J via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) tim--- via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 06)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Saku Ytti via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 07)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Nov 07)
- Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
