Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales)

[Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

I am not checking my emails until Nov 14th, 2025. Thanks, Samaneh

On Nov 8, 2025, at 7:49 AM, Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:

On 07.11.2025 06:32 Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard () huawei com>
wrote:

3. My message was not that "IPv4 is enough". The shortage of IPv4
addresses is real. My message was that IPv6 design is so bad (on the
subnet level) that businesses would stay on IPv4.

Businesses stay on that because they don't want change. This applies to
operating system versions and protocols.

Remember when most businesses transferred HTTP traffic without TLS?
It was Google that made that mandatory, so they implemented it.

Same applies for SPF and DKIM. It existed more than 10 years and when
Google and other big player made it mandatory, the businesses hurried
up and implemented it.

If Google ever decides to make IPv6 a criteria for page rank,
businesses will implement that very fast.

--
kind regards
Marco

Send spam to abfall1762493530 () stinkedores dorfdsl de
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/3JNFOYGESX2IGJDYG7I7VPFQ2TGPVOVV/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/M22SBRHQYZPAT25BQDFWFLKOZK27HF7Q/