nanog mailing list archives
Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales)
From: Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 12:07:29 +0000
I am not checking my emails until Nov 14th, 2025. Thanks, Samaneh On Nov 6, 2025, at 12:16 PM, Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: Hi Marco, You are asking too much for 30M of business worldwide. Just outgoing connections redundancy is enough for 99% of them. Older times, they have DMZ and their own Web server. It does not make sense now - server may be in the cloud, but mostly it is not needed - they have an account on some platform. Eduard -----Original Message----- From: Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2025 14:08 To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org> Cc: Marco Moock <mm () dorfdsl de> Subject: Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) On 06.11.2025 07:18 Vasilenko Eduard wrote: The first time I configured Cisco 2500 with ISP redundancy in 1998. It worked fine: If the link to the primary ISP was down, the office (50 employees company) still have connectivity through the other link. And yes, the office network was not flat - it had many subnets. In case of failure all the connections fail and need to be restablished. That is not something I call redundancy. If you host services inside such a network, both IP addresses must be present in the DNS and that means clients can use any and take some time until they notice the failing connection. An established connection will break this way too. Redundancy is different and means your network is connected by 2 ISP - independent of their address ranges. _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/JKKZN4DXYID5VDCKAWH6BS7RMVKQZVJ5/__;!!PtGJab4!_pfIbt6GCDKyvIl7KKzEm_QwSA5IRXdMlTjPqtB88asmt92umyxOnZdfpw-o2HEJuDyrTAExcWErlLdf_Oys_-PqdZk$ [lists[.]nanog[.]org] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/64LNH6UVNZIOSW3XTUOBUPJBNCU7RLY6/__;!!PtGJab4!_pfIbt6GCDKyvIl7KKzEm_QwSA5IRXdMlTjPqtB88asmt92umyxOnZdfpw-o2HEJuDyrTAExcWErlLdf_OysJKjeF4o$ [lists[.]nanog[.]org] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/4RCLUPPS54RFMHNMKMK34A5U6RHV2LAS/
Current thread:
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales), (continued)
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 06)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) nanog--- via NANOG (Nov 06)
- Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Brandon Martin via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Brandon Martin via NANOG (Nov 06)
