Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales)

[Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

I am not checking my emails until Nov 14th, 2025. Thanks, Samaneh

On Nov 6, 2025, at 12:07 PM, Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:

On 06.11.2025 07:18 Vasilenko Eduard wrote:

The first time I configured Cisco 2500 with ISP redundancy in 1998.
It worked fine: If the link to the primary ISP was down, the office
(50 employees company) still have connectivity through the other
link. And yes, the office network was not flat - it had many subnets.

In case of failure all the connections fail and need to be restablished.
That is not something I call redundancy.

If you host services inside such a network, both IP addresses must be
present in the DNS and that means clients can use any and take some
time until they notice the failing connection.

An established connection will break this way too.

Redundancy is different and means your network is connected by 2 ISP -
independent of their address ranges.
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog 
org/message/JKKZN4DXYID5VDCKAWH6BS7RMVKQZVJ5/__;!!PtGJab4!9EXi8huLtMFGW31qo6OCGEsslDZRxG97SEYnld9b7WztWWYt7tbVcoX32lJalm86cusIs86v2fN2QYiUWrvvfFkkRWU$
 [lists[.]nanog[.]org]
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/RSDTNMT3LW5NIBHBBXKYXDIFII75NTXC/