Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales)

[Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

I am not checking my emails until Nov 14th, 2025. Thanks, Samaneh

On Nov 6, 2025, at 8:08 AM, Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:

On 06.11.2025 06:13 Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
wrote:

Absence of NAT seems like a feature to me.
Only if IETF would fix multi-hop multi-prefix solution for the
business site. Home Networking WG did fail. SHIM6 failed too. Till
that time, NAT is the only solution for business.

You seem to have no experience with real redundancy. Those NAT
solutions cannot provide it.

You can reach the same situation with NAT66 like with NAT44, if you
really want.

Real redundancy solutions exist and certain businesses use it.

--
kind regards
Marco

Send spam to abfall1762406007 () stinkedores dorfdsl de
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/DZAUF66Y32I5KB5KBV6PF6I7ZJ7E34K4/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/QLFRAT3YSJ6KYUHE64VFMECNPHD3ULKW/