nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN’s Directory Services)
From: Shane Ronan via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 19:44:31 -0400
John, Your email says "This transition is an important step toward improving alignment with established IETF standards.", aligning a new feature to a standard doesn't mean shutting down a service that is used in so many ways, and expecting users to rely on a service that by your own admission isn't the standard in todays OS deployments. Wouldn't it make sense to work with the OS community to rdap clients ubiquitous before pushing a sunset of whois? Shane On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 10:06 PM John Levine via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
According to Lavender-Jamie via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>:Which rfc calls for the decommissioning of whois? If there is one, I have not heard about it yet.None, but ICANN told their contracted TLDs to support RDAP by February 2024 for DNS names. In January 2025 they said that WHOIS is no longer required, and a lot of them have now turned off their WHOIS servers.These types of breaking changes must not be made until rdap obtains the same level of support that whois does.We passed that point several years ago. I have scripts that do a lot of lookups of both IPs and domain names, and they use RDAP for everything other than a few country ccTLDs that still don't do RDAP. RDAP is much, much better than WHOIS. It has well defined query and response syntax rather than being an ill-defined adaptation of a 50 year old proticol invented for something else, and since it's based on HTTP it automatically handles redirects and forwarding and encryption yin transit. R's, John _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/HF6T4KG6EWH3ZFRKU6WXSLEYROP3RGJ3/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/QL6YG2UQ6BTDIO63FLZQWIRJT7RBZCQW/
Current thread:
- Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN’s Directory Services), (continued)
- Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN’s Directory Services) Job Snijders via NANOG (Aug 14)
- Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN’s Directory Services) Sam Thomas via NANOG (Aug 15)
- Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN’s Directory Services) Matt Corallo via NANOG (Aug 17)
- Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN’s Directory Services) Andy Newton via NANOG (Aug 17)
- Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN’s Directory Services) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Aug 17)
- Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN’s Directory Services) Randy Bush via NANOG (Aug 17)
- Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN’s Directory Services) Job Snijders via NANOG (Aug 14)
- Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARINʼs Directory Services) Mark Kosters via NANOG (Aug 14)
- Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN’s Directory Services) Randy Bush via NANOG (Aug 15)
- Re: Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN’s Directory Services) John Levine via NANOG (Aug 15)
- Re: Re: Whois using these ARIN services?? (fwd: Consultation on the Future of ARIN’s Directory Services) Shane Ronan via NANOG (Aug 18)
