nanog mailing list archives
Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size
From: Mark Tinka via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 20:40:30 +0200
On 27/07/2026 19:08, Tom via NANOG wrote:
Hello, I'm wondering what some practical/real experiences have been with building out a large flat IS-IS network. I've read a lot of threads on conjecture and older docs on what the vendors recommend but haven't found anything yet or real world examples. Two questions, 1) Is anyone running a flat IS-IS L2 network with approx 300 routers? If not, what is the higher end you've seen? 2) On aggregation routers, what is the upper end of IS-IS adj to downstream routers? Would agg routers with approx 100 connections be an issue moving to IS-IS with the addition of keeping track of that many adj?
With today's control planes, 300 nodes is not even a corn flake :-).We did that number back in 2009, on Cisco CRS-1's, ME3600X's and Juniper M320's, T320's and MX480's.
The state-of-the-art has moved on a great deal, since then. Mark. _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/SCR7AOTLQUZCHITR2O4PFXDSB4QJ7MOD/
Current thread:
- IS-IS Flat Network Size Tom via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Mark Tinka via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Dan Snyder via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Matthew Petach via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 28)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Pedro Prado via NANOG (Jul 28)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 28)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Matthew Petach via NANOG (Jul 29)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 30)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 27)
