nanog mailing list archives
Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size
From: Dan Snyder via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 21:14:21 -0400
It really depends on what hardware you are using, how large of a fault domain you want if there is an issue in the L2 area, and how quickly you expect it to converge if there is a failure. On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 2:55 PM Tom Beecher via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
Yeah 300 nodes in a single flat L2 area generally shouldn't be a problem. You may need to tweak SPF delay depending on geographic distribution and/or total size of the LSDB , but it should be very doable. Realistically if the LSDB size is a thing you probably shouldn't be running a flat area anyways, but with a little tweaking you can get away with it just fine. On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 2:41 PM Mark Tinka via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:On 27/07/2026 19:08, Tom via NANOG wrote:Hello, I'm wondering what some practical/real experiences have been withbuilding out a large flat IS-IS network. I've read a lot of threads on conjecture and older docs on what the vendors recommend but haven't found anything yet or real world examples. Two questions,1) Is anyone running a flat IS-IS L2 network with approx 300 routers?Ifnot, what is the higher end you've seen?2) On aggregation routers, what is the upper end of IS-IS adj todownstream routers? Would agg routers with approx 100 connections be an issue moving to IS-IS with the addition of keeping track of that manyadj?With today's control planes, 300 nodes is not even a corn flake :-). We did that number back in 2009, on Cisco CRS-1's, ME3600X's and Juniper M320's, T320's and MX480's. The state-of-the-art has moved on a great deal, since then. Mark. _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/SCR7AOTLQUZCHITR2O4PFXDSB4QJ7MOD/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/D4STUB57OFLPZMMF5TW5FTGJHAA76OWZ/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/QVW2W22FJDQXQQ7IIFQKZJJSRD22EHSG/
Current thread:
- IS-IS Flat Network Size Tom via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Mark Tinka via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Dan Snyder via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Matthew Petach via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 28)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Pedro Prado via NANOG (Jul 28)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 28)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Matthew Petach via NANOG (Jul 29)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 30)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 27)
