nanog mailing list archives
Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size
From: Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:13:30 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 27 Jul 2026, Tom via NANOG wrote:
1) Is anyone running a flat IS-IS L2 network with approx 300 routers? If not, what is the higher end you've seen?
As others have stated, 300 routers is (at least) 1-2 orders of magnitude lower than "this could be a problem" with modern hardware.
What I'd start to consider at (much) higher numbers than yours is number of routes you have in IS-IS, considering FIB update speed is in the order of tens of thousands per second on most hardware assisted platforms.
This means that if you have tens of thousands of routes, you want to make sure the platform you're using updates the important nexthops first (for instance loopbacks) in the FIB, otherwise your covergence time suffers.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/A46AIQD4WPUSQA3OQZ5E5TEVZ24B6THY/
Current thread:
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size, (continued)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Mark Tinka via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Dan Snyder via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Matthew Petach via NANOG (Jul 27)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 28)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Pedro Prado via NANOG (Jul 28)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 28)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Matthew Petach via NANOG (Jul 29)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 30)
- Re: IS-IS Flat Network Size Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 27)
