nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv4 flag day


From: Pedro Prado via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:00:40 +0100

… which sounds right (not implementing something you don’t need).

“Need” has a different interpretation for those inside a simple network and
those interconnecting that network to everything else - a separation of
values that Nat and even pat happens to handle pretty well IMHO, for the
most part anyway, bar the well known issues.

What value the granularity of addresses inside a SMB brings to the outside
if the connectivity works without that? What does global-capable 128-bit
addressing help a cyber cafe?

I would hope that the research that goes into solving NAT/PAT issues would
trickle into improvements to the end to end upper protocols which would
eventually be unaware of how the network operates, similar to how L2 is
transparent today (bar MTU mismatches…)

*Pedro Martins Prado*
pedro.prado () gmail com / +353 83 036 1875 (FaceTime & WhatsApp)

On Fri 19 Jun 2026 at 15:33, Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
wrote:

Am 19.06.26 um 08:35 schrieb Arie Vayner:
To move IPv6 to the next level of SMB/enterprise adoption we need to make
it easier to consume by the average SMB - which means stop saying "NAT is
evil" or "NAT is not supported in IPv6", and unblock relevant IETF work.

There are devices for SMB that support stateful IPv6 NAT if they really
need this. Although, my experience is that most of the network
infrastructure in SMB environments is created one time and never touched
unless necessary. They will also not implement IPv6 with NAT unless they
really need it. Same applies to various other protocols.

--
Gruß
Marco

Junk-Mail bitte an trashcan () stinkedores dorfdsl de
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list

https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/AZFJS4DBXNUQQWO2ON2VGB7H2JKLBJTL/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/JRCXLXRPKM2ELJPJFD4IBACOEOQ7LKMW/

Current thread: