nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 flag day
From: Arie Vayner via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 23:35:54 -0700
The list is talking mostly NAT or no NAT, not single or dual stack. These are separate discussions, I'm absolutely not saying don't do NAT. I'm saying, If you want to do NAPT with your IPv6, go right ahead.
The core discussion is that assuming there are use cases that NAT solves, and the lack of NAT makes hard to solve, the IPv6 community made it hard for the average SMB sysadmin to deploy IPv6: NAT has been "banned", standards/BCP docs that mention NAT were not approved, and all the IPV6 best practices docs for IPv6 say "No NAT". So my take on "If you want to do NAPT with your IPv6, go right ahead", in the current state, is that it's not practical, and has become a real blocker for IPv6 ubiquity. To move IPv6 to the next level of SMB/enterprise adoption we need to make it easier to consume by the average SMB - which means stop saying "NAT is evil" or "NAT is not supported in IPv6", and unblock relevant IETF work. Tnx Arie On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 11:13 PM Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2026 at 09:03, Matthew Petach via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:So, hopefully people now understand why IPv4 isn't going away, and we can stop talking about a flag day or "shut it down for a day". Nobody wants to cause that level of economic harm for zero benefit.Short term thinking, the real economic damage of IPv4 is antitrust, which far exceeds any economic damage of flag day. Vote for IPv4 is a vote for monopolies and a vote against equitability. The list is talking mostly NAT or no NAT, not single or dual stack. These are separate discussions, I'm absolutely not saying don't do NAT. I'm saying, If you want to do NAPT with your IPv6, go right ahead. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/2TQ4CVYFD2SQCJ7I5IV6ILYVCLO5DGNG/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/AVH6HYI2OLUNAI7PWATSYBKEBIMLI5O5/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv4 flag day, (continued)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Douglas Fischer via NANOG (Jun 17)
- Re: IPv4 flag day sronan--- via NANOG (Jun 17)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Douglas Fischer via NANOG (Jun 17)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Matthew Petach via NANOG (Jun 17)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Jun 17)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv4 flag day Matthew Petach via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv4 flag day Matthew Petach via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Arie Vayner via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Pedro Prado via NANOG (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day sronan--- via NANOG (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day sronan--- via NANOG (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 19)
