nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day)
From: borg--- via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 19:31:54 +0200 (CEST)
Hmm, I personaly dont do any stats per RIR, so no clue.
From what I gathered, its not really RIR specific. It comes from
all over the world. If anything, some countries have more of those that others, but what is the reason? Law? Easy money to shaddy company? No clue either.. ---------- Original message ---------- From: Radu Anghel via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> To: nanog () lists nanog org Cc: Radu Anghel <radu.anghel () xindi ro> Subject: Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 16:10:59 +0200 On 22/06/2026 08:45, borg--- via NANOG wrote:
Are you trolling now, right? Because I cant imagine the havoc this would create on DFZ. Its already mess, due to 32bit ASNs. Spammers and abusers love those. They buy 32bit, lend some /24 space, announce, do whatever they want and then just go away and move to new ranges. Now imagine every person and their dog running BGP?
any idea which RIR is the most used by abusers of this type? perhaps not using Spamhaus DROP as a metric, even though, why not? ;) Radu _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/GJM6LZN6H7FUEENZ5FWHFUGCINOA7VR4/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/T6K6E2MPEHIJCHPAIZKZDM46YOVQX37C/
Current thread:
- BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day), (continued)
- BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Brian Knight via NANOG (Jun 21)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 21)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) borg--- via NANOG (Jun 21)
- RE: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 22)
- RE: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) borg--- via NANOG (Jun 22)
- RE: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 22)
- RE: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Jun 22)
- RE: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) borg--- via NANOG (Jun 22)
- RE: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Radu Anghel via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) borg--- via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) andrew--- via NANOG (Jun 23)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 23)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Arie Vayner via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jun 23)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Shane Ronan via NANOG (Jun 23)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Arie Vayner via NANOG (Jun 23)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 23)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jun 24)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Brian Knight via NANOG (Jun 22)
