Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day)

[Nick Hilliard via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

Gary Sparkes via NANOG wrote on 23/06/2026 03:54:
> > I'm now convinced that the proverbial ship has sailed. NAT had to
> > be developed for IPv6. It will be used. It is here to stay. The
> > "NAT is cancer" statement is old hat and no longer relevant.
>
> And for those customers who do 1:many nat, my software just won't
> support them. It's simple enough.

Surely what you mean is: "They just won't support my software. It's 
simple enough"?

Nick

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/5I22OTHAZXBQRTHRTM6G6X225UH7MN6H/