nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 flag day
From: Douglas Fischer via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:09:30 -0300
Em ter., 16 de jun. de 2026 às 11:53, Brian Knight via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> escreveu:
Is NAT still such a severe problem that we needed a different protocol?
Yes! NAT is Operational Cancer! And improving NAT is the same as steroids for cancer! -- Douglas Fernando Fischer Engº de Controle e Automação _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/WLVD3GAVGKOCNTNOAFHPH6KOYIQ7FRV2/
Current thread:
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day), (continued)
- Re: BGP user friendliness (was Re: IPv4 flag day) Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Mike Hammett via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Mike Hammett via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Nick Hilliard via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Jay Acuna via NANOG (Jun 16)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 16)
- Re: IPv4 flag day borg--- via NANOG (Jun 17)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 16)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Joe Maimon via NANOG (Jun 16)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Jeff Shultz via NANOG (Jun 16)
- Re: IPv4 flag day David Prall via NANOG (Jun 16)
- Re: IPv4 flag day David Prall via NANOG (Jun 16)
- Re: IPv4 flag day William Herrin via NANOG (Jun 16)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 16)
- Re: IPv4 flag day jordi.palet--- via NANOG (Jun 16)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Vincent Bernat via NANOG (Jun 17)
