
IDS mailing list archives
RES: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots
From: "Augusto Paes de Barros" <augusto () paesdebarros com br>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:17:46 -0000
Lance's point can be expanded in very interesting views. Why use only honeypots "hosts" or "nets", when whe can use accounts, documents, info, etc? I was developing an idea that I call "honeytokens", to use on Windows networks. Basically, information that shouldn't be flowing over the network and, if you can detect it, something wrong is happening. -- Augusto Paes de Barros, CISSP http://www.paesdebarros.com.br augusto () paesdebarros com br -----Mensagem original----- De: Lance Spitzner [mailto:lance () honeynet org] Enviada em: quinta-feira, 20 de fevereiro de 2003 15:59 Para: Robert Graham Cc: Focus on Intrusion Detection Systems; slyph () alum mit edu Assunto: Re: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Robert Graham wrote:
People have been hoping that there is some sort of magic-pill technology
that
solves the problem of IDS. "Protocol-anomaly detection" is one of those buzzwords that promises a magic pill.
Okay, I'll admit, to me alot of the security problems I see are nothing more then nails, and honeypots are the hammer. However, seriously, have folks considered the detection capabilities of honeypots? The reason I bring this up in this thread, is for honeypots, everything is an anamoly. The concept of a honeypot is it has no production or authorized activity. Everything it captures its way is most likely malicious activity. Not only that, but you dramaticaly reduce 'noise'. Instead of dealing with 5,000 alerts a day (not that high of a number for many organizations) a honeypot in the same environment could only generate 5 or 10 alerts a day, alerts you most likely need to take action on. These small data sets can make it far easier and cost effective to identify and act on unauthorized activity. I'm in no way suggesting that honeypots replace any existing detection technologies, I'm suggesting that can contribute. Personally, I feel the concept of deception has overshadowed the value of honeypots, when one of their true values lies in detection. lance ----------------------------------------------------------- Does your IDS have Intelligent Attack Profiling? If not, see what you're missing. Download a free 15-day trial of StillSecure Border Guard. http://www.securityfocus.com/stillsecure ----------------------------------------------------------- Does your IDS have Intelligent Attack Profiling? If not, see what you're missing. Download a free 15-day trial of StillSecure Border Guard. http://www.securityfocus.com/stillsecure
Current thread:
- RES: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots Augusto Paes de Barros (Feb 21)
- Re: RES: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots Lance Spitzner (Feb 21)
- RE: RES: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots Pete Herzog (Feb 21)
- Re: RES: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots dreamwvr () dreamwvr com (Feb 21)
- RE: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots Rob Shein (Feb 21)
- RE: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots Jordan K Wiens (Feb 21)
- RE: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots Rob Shein (Feb 21)
- RE: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots Jordan K Wiens (Feb 21)
- RE: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots Rob Shein (Feb 21)
- RES: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots Augusto Paes de Barros (Feb 21)
- RE: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots Rob Shein (Feb 21)
- RE: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots Jordan K Wiens (Feb 21)
- Re: RES: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots Lance Spitzner (Feb 21)