nanog mailing list archives

Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator?

From: andrew--- via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 23:44:30 -0000

So the tl;dr I'm getting from this is that 

- I don't think anyone considers this 'acceptable' for an ISP

- Everyone knows that AT&T does it anyway

I haven't found any documentation on how or why AT&T is actually doing this, so it's all either very old or they've 
scrubbed it from the internet (I know they deleted their whole forums, and it seems like some of the discussion was 
formerly there)
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/NFUAW4XI2Z3UGC2OHIO457D6KSNWMJU6/

Current thread:

What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Andrew via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? John Fraizer via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Mukund Sivaraman via NANOG (Dec 24)
  - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Mel Beckman via NANOG (Dec 24)
  - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Jon Lewis via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Tom Beecher via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 24)
  - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 25)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 25)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? andrew--- via NANOG (Dec 25)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Ca By via NANOG (Dec 25)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Tim Burke via NANOG (Dec 26)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Pedro Prado via NANOG (Dec 26)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 26)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Pedro Prado via NANOG (Dec 27)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Ca By via NANOG (Dec 27)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 26)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 26)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Dec 26)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 26)

(Thread continues...)