nanog mailing list archives

Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator?

From: Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2025 07:43:46 +0100

On 26.12.2025 22:47 Pedro Prado via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:

Is QUIC also affected in any way?


It uses UDP, so it is affected by NAT, but not by MSS-clamping.
If PMTUD fails and people use MSS-Clamping, QUIC will fail.

-- 
kind regards
Marco

Send spam to abfall1766785668 () stinkedores dorfdsl de

Attachment: _bin
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/QV6VJ5PTQZANHUE6KOAXNC4FF7RXHDWC/

Current thread:

Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator?, (continued)
- - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Mel Beckman via NANOG (Dec 24)
  - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Jon Lewis via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Tom Beecher via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 24)
  - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 25)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 25)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? andrew--- via NANOG (Dec 25)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Ca By via NANOG (Dec 25)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Tim Burke via NANOG (Dec 26)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Pedro Prado via NANOG (Dec 26)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 26)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Pedro Prado via NANOG (Dec 27)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Ca By via NANOG (Dec 27)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 26)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 26)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Dec 26)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 26)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Dec 27)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 27)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? nanog--- via NANOG (Dec 30)
    - Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 30)

(Thread continues...)