nanog mailing list archives
Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator?
From: Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2025 12:39:20 +0200
On Fri, 26 Dec 2025 at 18:08, Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
If that fixes the problem, PMTU discovery (mandatory for IPv6 and IPv4 with DF bit) is broken and that means UDP, IPsec, GRE etc. all fail. The ISPs I used emit ICMP packet too big messages.
While it would be terrific if this would work, reality is that content networks all have tried, and all have resorted to fixing lower MSS. Internet is just too broken. Idealistically I agree. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/L3CKJXEX64JD7CWF7CHMSVH7OOS5CGSX/
Current thread:
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator?, (continued)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Ca By via NANOG (Dec 25)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Tim Burke via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Pedro Prado via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Pedro Prado via NANOG (Dec 27)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Ca By via NANOG (Dec 27)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Dec 27)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 27)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? nanog--- via NANOG (Dec 30)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 30)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Lukas Tribus via NANOG (Dec 30)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Tom Beecher via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Jared Mauch via NANOG (Dec 26)
