nanog mailing list archives
Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator?
From: Ca By via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2025 09:33:19 +0900
On Fri, Dec 26, 2025 at 8:44 AM andrew--- via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
So the tl;dr I'm getting from this is that - I don't think anyone considers this 'acceptable' for an ISP - Everyone knows that AT&T does it anyway I haven't found any documentation on how or why AT&T is actually doing this, so it's all either very old or they've scrubbed it from the internet (I know they deleted their whole forums, and it seems like some of the discussion was formerly there)
If you google the term “middlebox”, you will see a lot of research on it from 10 years ago. It was a hot topic of academic and commercial pursuit, but time has proven it is boring for both
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/NFUAW4XI2Z3UGC2OHIO457D6KSNWMJU6/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/6S6HRIMZXGI7HTGSW53JHPU3RKT6STUP/
Current thread:
- What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Andrew via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? John Fraizer via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Mukund Sivaraman via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Mel Beckman via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Jon Lewis via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Tom Beecher via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 24)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 25)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 25)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? andrew--- via NANOG (Dec 25)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Ca By via NANOG (Dec 25)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Tim Burke via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Pedro Prado via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Pedro Prado via NANOG (Dec 27)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Ca By via NANOG (Dec 27)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 25)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: What do you consider acceptable packet / session modification for a network operator? Saku Ytti via NANOG (Dec 27)
