nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...]
From: Michael Thomas via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 18:11:27 -0700
On 7/3/25 6:02 PM, Alex Buie via NANOG wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 7:43 PM Michael Thomas via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:On 7/3/25 5:33 PM, Alex Buie via NANOG wrote:"the more you try to outsource critical thinking to a machine that cannot critically think, the more and more you will get duped by scammers" SPF/DKIM/DMARC are all automated ways to try and outsource truthiness checks to machines. they make people feel comfortable with their result.somuch so they stop actually using their brains to protect themselves.So by all means, let's get rid of TLS as well. ::eyeroll:: MikeI'm not saying to get rid of any of these things. I'm just saying expecting them to replace user training in critical thinking is foolish, and overall, the point Rich made makes sense. If you tell people "as long as you check these things you can trust it" they are way more likely to believe something unbelievable if it has all those "you can trust me" flags.
Good thing nobody thought that it's a substitute. Making incremental improvements don't have to be viewed as, uh, cure-alls. That would be, uh, foolish.
Mike _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/4FPNUYKZPDZELNK3XY5KWBH6HY7X4RK5/
Current thread:
- SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Rich Kulawiec via NANOG (Jul 02)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Alex Buie via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Alex Buie via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Alex Buie via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Amir Herzberg via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Amir Herzberg via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] John Levine via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] John Levine via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Amir Herzberg via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Alex Buie via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 03)
