nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...]
From: Amir Herzberg via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:48:54 -0400
On Sat, Jul 5, 2025 at 3:05 PM Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote:
... Do you have any visibility into, say, MAAWG and why they don't take this up as a standards effort? When we were developing DKIM, even though a UI component was out of scope for IETF it didn't mean there was anything like consensus that it was also
Mike, we are still just investigating this idea. While initial results are encouraging, we have to wait for the experiments to see if it _may_ make sense (and if so, surely more experiments to gain confidence). Thanks (also for the reference!), Amir
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/CMYZA2TFLSSRKKFAVDQEBW644B7U3JKI/
Current thread:
- SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Rich Kulawiec via NANOG (Jul 02)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Alex Buie via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Alex Buie via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Alex Buie via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Amir Herzberg via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Amir Herzberg via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] John Levine via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] John Levine via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Amir Herzberg via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Alex Buie via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Barry Shein via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Tim Howe via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Tim Howe via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 03)
