Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...]

[Michael Thomas via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

On 7/5/25 7:06 PM, John Levine via NANOG wrote:
> It appears that Michael Thomas via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> said:
> > The research paper I pointed to disagrees. It's not a panacea, but it's
> > helpful.
> I took a look at the paper and was underwhelmed. They were shocked to find that
> most of the Alexa top 1000 don't have DKIM or DMARC records, and well, duh,
> that's intended to be a list of the top 1000 web domains most of which don't do
> mail at all. For the ones that did do DKIM and DMARC, the mail systems did a
> reasonable job of keeping the forged mail out.
That's why you are not credible: they did research. you did.. nothing.

As always. As I said: dysfunction. And all of the rest of you.

Mike


_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/GN3UUACLN4RL5L3O4JXBTMVCCM6YNHBE/