nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...]
From: Tim Howe via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 16:39:04 -0700
On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 16:08:40 -0700 Michael Thomas via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
On 7/5/25 4:00 PM, Tim Howe via NANOG wrote:One of the biggest problems I face is that spamming is largely accepted as perfectly normal for some groups. Convince marketing people that they shouldn't be able to just email everyone they can identify about anything they want and it just doesn't compute. I get more spam directly from Salesforce's network than anywhere else because it's a service their customers expect them to supply. Have fun fighting that.Is that still really a thing? I mean of course I know that opt-out marketing mail is common as dirt, but it seems pretty common to have a simple unsubscribe button at the end of the email. I mean, it's annoying, but they see to work from what I can tell.
Yeah, maybe. How many new iterations of the same email, same list, same company with a slightly different domain or slightly different name do you feel you should be unsubscribing from on a daily basis? 5? 6? 10? Daily?!??! "Just unsubscribe!" Sure. --TimH _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/7P4BP7V2AEBPXOKMP4KS5KEULDDJG4CC/
Current thread:
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...], (continued)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Amir Herzberg via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] John Levine via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] John Levine via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Amir Herzberg via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Barry Shein via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Tim Howe via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Tim Howe via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] John Levine via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Mark Andrews via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Charles Polisher via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Mark Andrews via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] John R. Levine via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Barry Shein via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] John R. Levine via NANOG (Jul 06)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Barry Shein via NANOG (Jul 06)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 06)
