nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...]
From: Mark Andrews via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 12:26:26 +1000
So you want people to click a random url in an unsolicited email message? List-unsubscribe: RFC8085 provides a mechanism to mitigate that issue as there is no expected interaction. MUAs know how to display an unsubscribe button these days. -- Mark Andrews
On 6 Jul 2025, at 09:09, Michael Thomas via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: On 7/5/25 4:00 PM, Tim Howe via NANOG wrote: One of the biggest problems I face is that spamming is largely accepted as perfectly normal for some groups. Convince marketing people that they shouldn't be able to just email everyone they can identify about anything they want and it just doesn't compute. I get more spam directly from Salesforce's network than anywhere else because it's a service their customers expect them to supply. Have fun fighting that.Is that still really a thing? I mean of course I know that opt-out marketing mail is common as dirt, but it seems pretty common to have a simple unsubscribe button at the end of the email. I mean, it's annoying, but they see to work from what I can tell. Mike _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/Q3R2SWY3V2NAJFYXOACJYWJU32LEV34F/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/74SJ6IYJGMW6RUATXWB6IHRGXUW7JTN2/
Current thread:
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...], (continued)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] John Levine via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Amir Herzberg via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Barry Shein via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Tim Howe via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Tim Howe via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] John Levine via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Mark Andrews via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Charles Polisher via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Mark Andrews via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] John R. Levine via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Barry Shein via NANOG (Jul 05)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] John R. Levine via NANOG (Jul 06)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Barry Shein via NANOG (Jul 06)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 06)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Barry Shein via NANOG (Jul 07)
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Michael Thomas via NANOG (Jul 07)
- Message not available
- Re: SPF/DKIM/DMARC et.al.: REALLY LONG [was: is it just me or...] Barry Shein via NANOG (Jul 07)
