Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF

[Christopher Morrow via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

I hadn't seen anyone note (in this forum) that the proposal here is:
  1) already stepping on a proposal which got closed out ~25 yrs (or more?) ago
     <can't find jim fleming's draft, sorry, though we are all better
off for not finding it?>
  2) that this smells an awful lot like 8+8 GSE ->
     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ipngwg-gseaddr-00
(hey mo!)

probably sometime in the future another IPNGWG will get spun up, but
that day's not today.

On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 10:51 AM Tom Beecher via NANOG
<nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
> > Tough love is needed here, and the list is not providing it. You're
> > not being polite, you're enabling.
>
>
> Only works when the recipient is actually open to receiving feedback and
> collaborating.

I read SOME of the replies from the author as ...
computer-person-computer-personing...
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/VMLM25NA4R7FT42A2OUQGW3LLEOIDY7A/