Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF

[sronan--- via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

Deployed and Fully Deployed are two very different things, but this proposal would have the same problem getting 
deployed that IPv6 does, which is why? For MOST users IPv4 still works.

Shane

> On Apr 30, 2026, at 12:46 PM, Josh Luthman via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
>
> IPv6 is deployed?  There is a routine thread here a couple of times a year
> complaining about how it isn't.
>
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 12:44 PM Lucien Hoydic via NANOG <
> > nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
> >
> > I see no need for this IPv8. IPv6 was carefully engineered over many years
> > and while not perfect, works and is deployed. What problem are you trying
> > to solve? I seem to have missed that.
> >
> > No one is going to adopt IPv8. This is an academic discussion at best.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, April 30th, 2026 at 10:51 AM, Joe Klein via NANOG <
> > nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
> >
> > > This is very funny!
> > >
> > > - In 2004, very talented Chinese developers worked to implement IPv9. At
> > > present there are exclusive patents, but have yet to seen any code.
> > >
> > > - Over 20 cumulative years, there are about 0.5–2 trillion IPv6 address
> > > instances, with the high side is driven by mobile devices, Wi-Fi roaming,
> > > privacy-address rotation, VMs, containers, VPNs, and tunnels. In short,
> > > this covers the ocean floor, caves, areas near Earth, and deep space.
> > Will
> > > you and your team pay for the IPv4/IPv6 change? When will you submit the
> > > patent applications (Similary to Microsoft patent for SEND/CGA)?
> > >
> > > Have fun.
> > >
> > > OO.
> > >
> > > Joe Klein
> > >
> > > "inveniet viam, aut faciet" --- Seneca's Hercules Furens (Act II, Scene
> > 1)
> > > "*I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been."
> > > -- *Wayne
> > > Gretzky
> > > "I never lose. I either win or learn" - Nelson Mandela
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2026, 10:51 AM Tom Beecher via NANOG <
> > nanog () lists nanog org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Tough love is needed here, and the list is not providing it. You're
> > > > > not being polite, you're enabling.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Only works when the recipient is actually open to receiving feedback
> > and
> > > > collaborating.
> > > >
> > > > Reading Mr. Thain's replies here and on int-area answers that question
> > > > quite rapidly.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 2:35 AM Saku Ytti via NANOG <
> > nanog () lists nanog org
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Tough love is needed here, and the list is not providing it. You're
> > > > > not being polite, you're enabling.
> > > > >
> > > > > Stop supporting this LLM psychosis.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >  ++ytti
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > NANOG mailing list
> > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/QAQPQMJT3AEGHZERA2XJW3WIWBAMHBAI/
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > NANOG mailing list
> > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/YAH63OJ4IJ3GKNROAILZHO6YXQQ5NQ2S/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NANOG mailing list
> > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/WWUAVWF5VUGLB7FCE6NE4LAMOGPDM7LP/
> > _______________________________________________
> > NANOG mailing list
> >
> > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/HTZGUHK5OFQTIOM4PGETYTNEUIWPDEDW/
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/EIZ73ZKWZQMCTM3OT64ZG5DT5FXT5QJD/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/YXM4IX2ML4UOM2OLZGGQNOERCCNTABBZ/