nanog mailing list archives

RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF


From: Larry Brower via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:32:25 +0000

" People are planning to build ipv8 right now."

Are these people in the room with us?


----
Larry Brower
Network Specialist
Texas Department of Insurance

-----Original Message-----
From: Jamie Thain via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2026 2:29 PM
To: Joe Klein <jsklein () gmail com>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org>; Jamie Thain <jamie () one bm>
Subject: Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF

ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown or 
unexpected emails.

Joe,

No patent apps it's all free. Corp isn't moving off ipv4 to ipv6. So ipv8 is an upgrade to ipv4.

So still need to fix the issues in ipv4/ipv6.

Like merging to companies both using 10.x

Unless a move is made ipv4 will still be running the warp drive.

People are planning to build ipv8 right now.

Jamie

On Thu., Apr. 30, 2026, 12:51 p.m. Joe Klein, <jsklein () gmail com> wrote:

This is very funny!

- In 2004, very talented Chinese developers worked to implement IPv9.
At present there are exclusive patents, but have yet to seen any code.

- Over 20 cumulative years, there are about 0.5–2 trillion IPv6
address instances, with the high side is driven by mobile devices,
Wi-Fi roaming, privacy-address rotation, VMs, containers, VPNs, and
tunnels. In short, this covers the ocean floor, caves, areas near
Earth, and deep space. Will you and your team pay for the IPv4/IPv6
change? When will you submit the patent applications (Similary to Microsoft patent for SEND/CGA)?

Have fun.

OO.

Joe Klein

"inveniet viam, aut faciet" --- Seneca's Hercules Furens (Act II,
Scene 1) "*I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been."
-- *Wayne Gretzky
"I never lose. I either win or learn" - Nelson Mandela

On Thu, Apr 30, 2026, 10:51 AM Tom Beecher via NANOG <
nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:


Tough love is needed here, and the list is not providing it. You're
not being polite, you're enabling.


Only works when the recipient is actually open to receiving feedback
and collaborating.

Reading Mr. Thain's replies here and on int-area answers that
question quite rapidly.

On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 2:35 AM Saku Ytti via NANOG <
nanog () lists nanog org>
wrote:

Tough love is needed here, and the list is not providing it. You're
not being polite, you're enabling.

Stop supporting this LLM psychosis.

--
  ++ytti
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list


https://lis/
ts.nanog.org%2Farchives%2Flist%2Fnanog%40lists.nanog.org%2Fmessage%2F
QAQPQMJT3AEGHZERA2XJW3WIWBAMHBAI%2F&data=05%7C02%7Clarry.brower%40tdi
.texas.gov%7Cc3453c4609a743c6edf508dea6eee8e4%7C6c600c887a50421a9817a
970a01aed2a%7C0%7C0%7C639131742220406986%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJF
bXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpb
CIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=z68PupwkZzOUUeCDnys6LqnLWd%2BF
Qk%2BbKmyR7hWOvqk%3D&reserved=0

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list

https://lis/
ts.nanog.org%2Farchives%2Flist%2Fnanog%40lists.nanog.org%2Fmessage%2F
YAH63OJ4IJ3GKNROAILZHO6YXQQ5NQ2S%2F&data=05%7C02%7Clarry.brower%40tdi
.texas.gov%7Cc3453c4609a743c6edf508dea6eee8e4%7C6c600c887a50421a9817a
970a01aed2a%7C0%7C0%7C639131742220433138%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJF
bXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpb
CIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=S8FDk5iZSahEvFlR2%2FTPr9d%2Fr5
tqYX%2FGJRcg2GFPfb4%3D&reserved=0












_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/KMODQSXZM35D3SHAER4UGOBOTWP22BD3/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/DX3SUIZKNSXDLU5HRZ26V3A5O7BUPWKA/

Current thread: