nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
From: Jamie Thain via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:15:37 +0000
Shane, Missed the mark on what? I'm trying to fix IPv4 for corporates. You guys do whatever you want. I want help fixing BGP but if you think its all great so be it. Jamie On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 5:10 PM <sronan () ronan-online com> wrote:
If you have worked in the large scale network world as long as you say you have, you’d know that 99.9999% of what comes out of universities at this point related to networks and network protocols is all pipe dreams and has no connection to reality. Here on NANOG you have the OPERATORS of the world largest networks, and they are all telling you, that you missed the mark, that should tell you something. ShaneOn Apr 30, 2026, at 4:06 PM, Jamie Thain via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org[nanog () lists nanog org]> wrote:Larry, Maybe, I am not sure the Nanog group has the same people, but someuniversitystudents are working on it. I have one thing I am trying to finish. But let me ask you, I assume you run a pretty big network. And likely on 10.x.x.x as thats what everyone does. How much more convenient would it be to segment networks by internal ASN number I chose 127.x.x.x as local network. 127.<department>.<region>.floor. == 10 Billion IP addresses. Everything would be secured, isolated, managed, auditable. JamieOn Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 4:32 PM Larry Brower <Larry.Brower () tdi texas gov[Larry.Brower () tdi texas gov]> wrote:" People are planning to build ipv8 right now." Are these people in the room with us? ---- Larry Brower Network Specialist Texas Department of Insurance -----Original Message----- From: Jamie Thain via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org [nanog () lists nanog org][nanog () lists nanog org [nanog () lists nanog org]]>Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2026 2:29 PM To: Joe Klein <jsklein () gmail com [jsklein () gmail com] [jsklein () gmail com[jsklein () gmail com]]>Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org[nanog () lists nanog org][nanog () lists nanog org [nanog () lists nanog org]]>; Jamie Thain <jamie () one bm[jamie () one bm] [jamie () one bm [jamie () one bm]]>Subject: Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachmentsorclick on links from unknown or unexpected emails. Joe, No patent apps it's all free. Corp isn't moving off ipv4 to ipv6. So ipv8isan upgrade to ipv4. So still need to fix the issues in ipv4/ipv6. Like merging to companies both using 10.x Unless a move is made ipv4 will still be running the warp drive. People are planning to build ipv8 right now. Jamie On Thu., Apr. 30, 2026, 12:51 p.m. Joe Klein, <jsklein () gmail com[jsklein () gmail com][jsklein () gmail com [jsklein () gmail com]]> wrote:This is very funny! - In 2004, very talented Chinese developers worked to implement IPv9. At present there are exclusive patents, but have yet to seen any code. - Over 20 cumulative years, there are about 0.5–2 trillion IPv6 address instances, with the high side is driven by mobile devices, Wi-Fi roaming, privacy-address rotation, VMs, containers, VPNs, and tunnels. In short, this covers the ocean floor, caves, areas near Earth, and deep space. Will you and your team pay for the IPv4/IPv6 change? When will you submit the patent applications (Similary toMicrosoftpatent for SEND/CGA)?Have fun. OO. Joe Klein "inveniet viam, aut faciet" --- Seneca's Hercules Furens (Act II, Scene 1) "*I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it hasbeen."-- *Wayne Gretzky "I never lose. I either win or learn" - Nelson Mandela On Thu, Apr 30, 2026, 10:51 AM Tom Beecher via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org [nanog () lists nanog org] [nanog () lists nanog org[nanog () lists nanog org]]> wrote:Tough love is needed here, and the list is not providing it. You're not being polite, you're enabling.Only works when the recipient is actually open to receiving feedback and collaborating. Reading Mr. Thain's replies here and on int-area answers that question quite rapidly. On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 2:35 AM Saku Ytti via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org [nanog () lists nanog org] [nanog () lists nanog org[nanog () lists nanog org]]>wrote:Tough love is needed here, and the list is not providing it. You're not being polite, you're enabling. Stop supporting this LLM psychosis. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lis/ [https://lis/] [https://lis/ [https://lis/]] ts.nanog.org [http://ts.nanog.org] [http://ts.nanog.org[http://ts.nanog.org]]%2Farchives%2Flist%2Fnanog%40lists.nanog.org [http://40lists.nanog.org] [http://40lists.nanog.org[http://40lists.nanog.org]]%2Fmessage%2FQAQPQMJT3AEGHZERA2XJW3WIWBAMHBAI%2F&data=05%7C02%7Clarry.brower%40tdi .texas.gov [http://texas.gov] [http://texas.gov [http://texas.gov]]%7Cc3453c4609a743c6edf508dea6eee8e4%7C6c600c887a50421a9817a970a01aed2a%7C0%7C0%7C639131742220406986%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJF bXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpb CIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=z68PupwkZzOUUeCDnys6LqnLWd%2BF Qk%2BbKmyR7hWOvqk%3D&reserved=0_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lis/ [https://lis/] [https://lis/ [https://lis/]] ts.nanog.org [http://ts.nanog.org] [http://ts.nanog.org[http://ts.nanog.org]]%2Farchives%2Flist%2Fnanog%40lists.nanog.org [http://40lists.nanog.org] [http://40lists.nanog.org[http://40lists.nanog.org]]%2Fmessage%2FYAH63OJ4IJ3GKNROAILZHO6YXQQ5NQ2S%2F&data=05%7C02%7Clarry.brower%40tdi .texas.gov [http://texas.gov] [http://texas.gov [http://texas.gov]]%7Cc3453c4609a743c6edf508dea6eee8e4%7C6c600c887a50421a9817a970a01aed2a%7C0%7C0%7C639131742220433138%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJF bXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpb CIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=S8FDk5iZSahEvFlR2%2FTPr9d%2Fr5 tqYX%2FGJRcg2GFPfb4%3D&reserved=0_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/[https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/]message/KMODQSXZM35D3SHAER4UGOBOTWP22BD3/ [https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/KMODQSXZM35D3SHAER4UGOBOTWP22BD3/ [https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/KMODQSXZM35D3SHAER4UGOBOTWP22BD3/] ][] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/YTOTVZJYZ4HG55MF6WGDTUKVQ54HHLVI/ [https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/YTOTVZJYZ4HG55MF6WGDTUKVQ54HHLVI/]
[] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/CHKAQYGQFUFZ3QPJJBJZRJBTCPJPWR3D/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF, (continued)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Shane Ronan via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Tom Beecher via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Rich Kulawiec via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Tom Beecher via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF sronan--- via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF steve ulrich via NANOG (Apr 30)
- RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Larry Brower via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF sronan--- via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (Apr 30)
- RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Larry Brower via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF sronan--- via NANOG (Apr 30)
- RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Justin Streiner via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Saku Ytti via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Dorn Hetzel via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Saku Ytti via NANOG (Apr 30)
