nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
From: Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 13:37:16 +0300
Appreciate attempt to solve the problem, but I am absolutely disgusted by the notion that this too will be measured by who has access to capital. Call me radical but I think that's an even worse problem than the LLM slop. Not coincidental that this problem was created by people with completely undeserved access to capital and are burning literally trillion annually on this. Bottom 80% of Americans consume as much as the top 20%, and it is getting worse, it may be 90/10 already. And we look up to those 10%, and now you're saying to address the problem they created, we must gate more of the world for them. On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 at 13:16, Dorn Hetzel via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
Here's a thought I had about that, for whatever it's worth -> https://medium.com/@dornhetzel/a-modest-proposal-for-open-source-trust-reform-10da3adc313e On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 3:47 AM Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:LLM produces code much much faster than you can review it. This argument worked in days of yore, when the person writing the code had to put in orders of magnitude more work in that person reviewing it. Anyone maintaining any open source project has seen this, massive complicated pull requests from people who cannot code and have strong expectations that you review it. They spent minutes generating it, you'll spend days reviewing it. On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 at 12:34, Izaac via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 02:03:34PM -0500, Jamie Thain via NANOG wrote:I'd appreciate your thoughts on itGot code? -- . ___ ___ . . ___ . \ / |\ |\ \ . _\_ /__ |-\ |-\ \__ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/6YSXKTNRAE646GVCUUXZBITFIK2OIGNU/ -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/W6QDEOKMI4JRX5M2HTWD7QTL62MFNYHU/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/54P7LOEOPELLIFTUHLZS3DZDXVE3XXTO/
-- ++ytti _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/PYLGHBUN4RQ5XM4N5KTLYLCY6RK7TU3Q/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF, (continued)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (Apr 30)
- RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Larry Brower via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF sronan--- via NANOG (Apr 30)
- RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Justin Streiner via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Saku Ytti via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Dorn Hetzel via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Saku Ytti via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Izaac via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Saku Ytti via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Nick Hilliard via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Joe Provo via NANOG (Apr 30)
