nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
From: Jamie Thain via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:05:35 +0000
Just some of my motivation for IPv8. On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 11:03 AM Jamie Thain <jamie () one bm> wrote:
Saku, I am not those people. I've written hundreds of thousands of lines of code. 1. Assess the issue. Its in the IETF posting (have you read it) 1.1 100% compatible segments with current IPv4 networks 1.2 It must be an inplace upgrade. 1.3 It must be more manageable, Oauth configuration and Important Telemetry 1.4 No new Silicon to get near wire speed. 1.5 Fix BGP cost factor, to deprecate OSPF and ISIS 1.6 No user impact. 1.7 Solve the corporate issues including 1.7.1 East West Security 1.7.2 North South Security 1.7.3 Area addressess ( ASN = 127.x.x.x) 16 million networks of 4 B addresses. 1.8 Make it easy to implement. 1.9 Routing issues -- valid routes route tables to big, peering too complext. 2. Design where I am write now, publish Assess the IETF document and work on Design. If you don't want to help don't hit reply. What I am currently working on is peering and routing inside the ASN without impacting silicon. On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 6:46 AM Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi [saku () ytti fi]> wrote:LLM produces code much much faster than you can review it. This argument worked in days of yore, when the person writing the code had to put in orders of magnitude more work in that person reviewing it. Anyone maintaining any open source project has seen this, massive complicated pull requests from people who cannot code and have strong expectations that you review it. They spent minutes generating it, you'll spend days reviewing it. On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 at 12:34, Izaac via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org [nanog () lists nanog org]> wrote:On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 02:03:34PM -0500, Jamie Thain via NANOG wrote:I'd appreciate your thoughts on itGot code? -- . ___ ___ . . ___ . \ / |\ |\ \ . _\_ /__ |-\ |-\ \__ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/6YSXKTNRAE646GVCUUXZBITFIK2OIGNU/ [https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/6YSXKTNRAE646GVCUUXZBITFIK2OIGNU/] -- ++ytti[]
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/XFWF3ADRICSHWPKB3B5QVDRJLX3UWH6J/
Current thread:
- RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF, (continued)
- RE: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Justin Streiner via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Izaac via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Saku Ytti via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Dorn Hetzel via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Saku Ytti via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Izaac via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Saku Ytti via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Nick Hilliard via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Joe Provo via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Saku Ytti via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Jamie Thain via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Apr 30)
- Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF Elmar K. Bins via NANOG (Apr 30)
